Sunday, July 27, 2008

A must read opinion


Another beutiful and blessed article on a Sunday - racun penawar.
TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ: Cut the theatrics, Anwar, and let Malaysians get on with their lives
By : Tunku Abdul Aziz
Email to friend Email to Friend Print article Print Article


IT seems to me that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is suffering from paranoid delusions. His preoccupation with what he sees as political conspiracy against him is doing his reputation and credibility, such as it is, enormous damage.

To compound the growing cynicism about his version of events, he has not, to date, been able to produce any verifiable evidence to support his contention.

As far as I am concerned, and for all practical purposes, his claim of victimisation at the evil hands of the authorities is just so much political posturing, and has to be viewed, sadly, as a ploy to gain sympathy for his cause and confuse the gullible in our midst.

And there are many who see a conspirator in every nook and corner, in much the same way that Americans, at the height of McCarthyism, looked under the bed before retiring for the night, half expecting to find a communist lurking there.

While Anwar expects the highest standards of proof in others, he is somehow both careless and cavalier about his own. He has made the preposterous accusation that the charge of sodomy brought against him by his former aide is part of a diabolically clever plot to stop his prime ministerial ambitions dead in their tracks.
That, too, must remain a matter for conjecture unless it can be proved otherwise. Many Malaysians await Anwar's irrefutable evidence with bated breath.

Does he not realise that many people can, and will, draw their own conclusions about the real reason behind his persistent refusal to give his blood for the purpose of a DNA test?

Let us get that over and done with so that the police can make a quick determination as to whether or not he had been maliciously accused of something he is innocent of.

Readers will no doubt recall that when he was in custody 10 years ago, he accused the authorities of administering arsenic to poison him.

All very dramatic, and the world was understandably aghast and shocked by that revelation.

Independent tests done in Australia, however, proved negative. Anwar showed absolutely no remorse about his having blackened his country's good name and reputation.

On the premise that there is one law for all, no one should reasonably expect normal police criminal investigation procedures to be set aside or compromised on the spurious ground of a lack of trust in the police. What is the evidence for this?

Anwar, for all his political savvy, now runs the risk of being likened to "the boy who cried wolf" -- once too often.

He should submit himself voluntarily to the DNA test, and if need be, under an independent expert observer group if this would help.

The police have been more accommodating in his case than I have seen in some others. And if he is innocent of the charge against him, there is "nothing to fear, but fear itself".

Conspiracy or no, even Anwar must know that the devil is in the detail: how does he propose to seize power except by resorting to unprincipled political machinations and manipulations?

He has to show that he has not totally abandoned his moral and ethical principles and this is the only way that he will ever recover the moral and intellectual high ground that he once occupied.

The moral support of right thinking people everywhere that he could at one time take for granted is beginning to wear thin.

What has happened to the mass exodus to his camp of ethically deficient political malcontents from The Land Below The Wind, across the South China Sea, that he predicted with an almost messianic zeal and prophetic certainty to help him topple the government and transform the nation?

He has done our Sabah politicians grave injury to their reputation. They have proved that they stand by certain personal values and standards of ethical behaviour.

I cannot imagine anything baser and more grotesque than attempting to corrupt and seduce perfectly decent and honourable parliamentarians to betray the trust of the voters who had put them there in the first place to represent them in their constituencies.

What kind of message is Anwar sending to the people of this country, and in particular to the young people now beginning to take an interest in political issues?

Dislodge the government by all means, if this is your purpose in life, but there is a time and place as provided under our electoral process.

The place is the ballot box, and the time is the 13th general election.

This is all part of our democratic system and what business have any of us to bring about a change of administration outside of the legal electoral framework?

I am well aware of the opposition song-and-dance about what they claim to be a defective electoral system before every election. But this constant refrain about the unfairness of it all is muted, now that the same defective process that they used to vent their spleen on with demonic vehemence has catapulted them into power in five states.

I suppose even they must now admit that it has not been that bad, after all, for those who were not expected to pick more than a few crumbs off the floor.

Anwar has made great play of his having to remove his clothes for his medical examination and implied that he was being singled out for special treatment.

I am assured by my doctor friends that it is normal procedure for certain types of examination. Many of us have been through this and we were none the worse for wear.

In my own case, on my visit to Israel two years ago, I was asked very politely to remove all my clothes by airport security.

More than at any time in my entire life, faced with the prospect of having to bare all, and not even paid for it in front of total strangers, I remembered my mother, thinking how right she had been to remind my brother and I always to wear clean underpants!

Like Anwar, I did not like the strip act one little bit, but unlike him, I did not kick up a fuss and neither did I call a press conference to denounce this "barbaric" practice against a senior United Nations official which was what I was at the time.

If I had been gripped by paranoia, I suppose I would have seen the whole exercise as being specially devised to humiliate me, a Muslim.

It was a security requirement and I respected their right to do everything possible in the interests of their country's security.

Anwar should desist from involving the international community in what is essentially a simple case. He somehow feels that the United States, the European Union and Japan should fight a proxy war against his country to shield him from the due process of law of his country.

I do not claim, naturally, to speak for other Malaysians, but there are people I know personally who are beginning to suspect his motives. It is poetic justice.

We must all take responsibility for our actions, and if we feel that we have been defamed or otherwise unfairly accused, we should place ourselves in the hands and at the mercy of the courts.

Anwar should submit himself to the country's criminal justice system like the rest of his fellow Malaysians and lead by example.

He is, after all, according to his supporters, a prime minister-in-waiting. I hope they are not holding their breath.

We are all getting a little sick and tired of the "Anwar factor" that is turning out to be an absolutely unnecessary distraction at a time when we need to get on with our lives.


* The writer is a former special adviser to the United Nations secretary-general on ethics.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

A Picture Paints a Thousand Words



The First President of UMNO Dato' Onn Jaafar (who is from Johor) followed by the second President that YAM Tuanku Abdul Rahman Putra Al Haj (Kedah)

The third President of UMNO was Tun Abdul Razak Hussein (Pahang) and the fourth President of UMNO is Tun Hussein Onn (who is from Johor).


The fifth President of UMNO is Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (from Kedah).

The sixth President of UMNO is Dato Seri Abdullah Hj Badawi (who is from Penang).

The chain is broken and that is why the Leadership is facing problems.

The Johor Kedah Pahang chain had been broken when Pak Lah became the UMNO President.
Instead of Johor, Kedah, Pahang it had become Johor, Kedah, Penang. The transition of power from Pak Lah to Dato Seri Najib will hopefully put the chain in order again.

Happy Birthday Dato Seri Najib



Its Dato' Seri Najib's birthday today.

Happy Birthday YAB Dato' Seri,

Many happy returns and wish you all the best of health.

Your friends, as you know, will be with you in good and bad times.

What are friends for anyway?

MUZAKARAH

ZAINUL ARIFIN: Inevitability of Umno-Pas 'muzakarah'
By : Zainul Arifin
Email to friend Email to Friend Print article Print Article


IT would have happened anyway, the meetings between Umno and Pas, if they had not already.

For despite the seemingly insurmountable differences in ideologies and sabre-rattling, there remain, at heart, two common denominators -- their members are overwhelmingly both Malay and Muslim.

Talks of meetings between the two to discuss issues affecting the ummah began surfacing soon after the 12th general election, once the dirty business of campaigning and electioneering were out of the way.

In fact, the talks were probably hastened by the outcomes of the elections.

Non-Umno Barisan Nasional component members in West Malaysia did disastrously for what is believed to be their affiliations with Umno -- remember the posters "A vote for BN, is a vote for Umno"?
The Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim-led Opposition managed to tap into the latent anger among non-Malays that BN was too Umno or Malay-centric. The buzzwords were of course Ketuanan Rakyat and no longer Ketuanan Melayu.

The victories of those -- Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Pas, DAP, etc -- promising to temper Umno's Malay dominance doctrine have suddenly made it politically incorrect and dangerous, even for the BN, to champion Malay issues.

At the same time many Malays were uncomfortable by the very public debates on what they perceived to be their rights and privileges, including that of Islam.

A major opposition leader could even belittle a monarch -- the very symbol of Malayness -- with nary a peep from Malay politicians in PR.

Perhaps it is a trade-off to nurture the nascent PR.

Thus, paradoxically, despite their numbers, the Malays seem to be losing their grip on arguments affecting them. Their fractious political base has made them politically benign.

Among the Malay-dominated parties, it is now left to Umno to talk on Malay issues, as Pas talks of Islam, and PKR, the new libertarian, champions no Malay agenda, per se.

Umno is not in the best of health of late, and PR is a Malay majority coalition, with no dominating Malay agenda.

Race has always been a factor in our politics, as in any country with multiracial make up. The difference is that for us race has always been touted as a rallying point for political activism.

From there, parties form coalitions and partnerships to bridge racial differences.

Political realities and political nirvana are obviously two different things.

Political realities are often grounded on messier constituents, such as race and religion, which both Pas and Umno claim to generally represent and idealise.

Obviously both of them cannot be right.

But on issues such as race and religion the consequences of disagreements, of course, can be dire.

Putting religious values to political affiliation have led to -- kafir-mengkafir -- labelling non-party members as infidels, even disallowing marriages between family members of different parties, and declaring haram meat slaughtered by others.

This rabid political loyalty, while much courted during polls, divides and splits the Malays, at times irreparably. Hence, the muzakarah, whose ultimate aim is for the coming together of the Malays, even if not politically.

Understandably, PKR and DAP while publicly nonchalant about the meetings, were obviously not too happy. Their leaders all said that PR was still strong, but you could sense the blue funk building up.

Is the muzakarah the pre-cursor of Pas re-joining BN, which many in PR are wary about?

Pas spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat said it would mean being bitten by the same snake from the same hole, again.

A merger is unlikely as there exist fundamental ideological differences, which makes PKR joining BN to be a likelier possibility than Pas' second leap of faith.

Perhaps the talks could bring Umno and Pas to a common ground on certain issues affecting Islam and Malay rights, while agreeing to disagree on how best they would approach the issues.

It is akin to what many suspect to be the "cooperation" between Chinese-led parties like MCA, DAP and Gerakan on issues affecting common interests, such as on Chinese schools or language.

At the very least the Umno-Pas talks could lead to less excessive politicking and lessen the burden of Malay Muslims having to live with political fatwas and dictates.

Monday, July 21, 2008

UMNO PAS UMNO PAS UMNO PAS



Apa pendapat Racun Penawar?

Belum

Belum

Belum

Belum ada pendapat lagi !

Friday, July 11, 2008

Transition of Power


You’re my man: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi giving a pat on the shoulder to Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak after announcing Najib as his successor. Abdullah said he would step down in June 2010 and hand over his duties to his deputy. – ART CHEN / The StarView more

Friday July 11, 2008

Politicians must work together to face crisis

Comment by V.K.Chin


IT will be great if all political parties and non-governmental organisations can sink their differences and work to face the serious financial and economic issues caused by the global rising cost of fuel.

Politicians from different camps must naturally take the lead since they have been given the support to look after voters’ interests and meet their aspirations and expectations.

However, those from the ruling party, that is the Barisan Nasional, must take the lead since they hold the reins of power and can make key decisions to ensure a better future for the people.

Barisan leaders will have to come up with concrete and workable policies to alleviate the people’s present hardship due to rising costs of fuel, food, utilities, services and transport.

But the opposition Keadilan, DAP and PAS must also give their support to such efforts when the nation is facing a financial and economic crisis, which could have dire consequences if not properly handled.

The public is getting uneasy with the continuing political bickering being engaged almost on a daily basis with both sides trying to smear each other to score points.

The people feel that all this sniping and undermining must stop and they expect all those elected, especially the Opposition, to give their full attention to curb the rising cost of living.

They are dismayed that in spite of giving the Opposition a stronger mandate, these elected representatives are not doing a proper job either in Parliament or state assemblies.

Some of these MPs appear to be more active outside Parliament than inside.

Instead of raising their plight in Parliament, many government and opposition members are spending too much time quarrelling with each other rather than debating bread-and-butter issues.

If the present trend continues, the people may get so fed up that they may take things into their own hands and may not take part in future elections.

Therefore, both government and opposition members must start realising that they have been elected to shape policies beneficial to the people and not to create a scene to disrupt meetings.

Once this difficult stage has been overcome, then they can play politics again. While the Barisan has been taught a good lesson in the 2008 general election, the Opposition too must realise that their success is not a licence to create mischief, disrupt or to serve their personal agenda.

If their actions are seen to be contributing to instability and chaos to the effect that the federal government cannot govern properly, then voters will believe that they might as well stick with the Barisan.

It is now entirely up to those in charge of the federal or state governments to uphold the trust placed in them by voters or face rejection in the next round.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Anecdote for Honourable Dr Wan Azizah

EVERY relationship has a cycle. In the beginning, you fell in love with your spouse/partner . You anticipated their call, wanted their touch, and liked their idiosyncrasies (unconventional behavior or habit).

Falling in love with your spouse wasn't hard. In fact, it was a completely natural and spontaneous experience. You didn't have to DO anything. That's why it's called 'falling' in love... Because it's happening TO YOU .

People in love sometimes say, 'I was swept of my feet.' Think about the imagery of that __expression. It implies that you were just standing there; doing nothing, and then something came along and happened TO YOU .

Falling in love is easy . It's a passive and spontaneous experience. But after a few years of marriage, the euphoria (excitement) of love fades. It's the natural cycle of EVERY relationship . Slowly but surely, phone calls become a bother (if they come at all), touch is not always welcome (when it happens), and your spouse's idiosyncrasies , instead of being cute, drive you nuts.


The symptoms of this stage vary with every relationship, but if you think about your marriage, you will notice a dramatic difference between the initial stage when you were in love and a much duller or even angry subsequent stage.

At this point, you and/or your spouse might start asking, 'Did I marry the right person?' And as you and your spouse reflect on the euphoria of the love you once had, you may begin to desire that experience with someone else. This is when marriages breakdown . People blame their spouse for their unhappiness and look outside their marriage for fulfillment.

Extramarital fulfillment comes in all shapes and sizes. Infidelity is the most obvious.



But sometimes people turn to work, a hobby, a friendship, excessive TV, or abusive substances.

But the answer to this dilemma does NOT lie outside your marriage. It lies within it.
I'm not saying that you couldn't fall in love with someone else.
You could.

And TEMPORARILY you'd feel better. But you'd be in the same situation a few years later. Because (listen carefully to this):

THE KEY TO SUCCEEDING IN MARRIAGE IS NOT FINDING THE RIGHT PERSON; IT'S LEARNING TO LOVE THE PERSON YOU FOUND.

SUSTAINING love is not a passive or spontaneous experience. It'll NEVER just happen to you. You can't 'find' LASTING love. You have to 'make' it day in and day out. That's why we have the __expression 'the labor of love.' Because it takes time, effort, and energy . And most importantly, it takes WISDOM . You have to know WHAT TO DO to make your marriage work.

Make no mistake about it. Love is NOT a mystery. There are specific things you can do (with or without your spouse) to succeed with your marriage.

Just as there are physical laws of the universe (such as gravity), there are also laws for relationships.
Just as the right diet and exercise program makes you physically stronger, certain habits in your relationship WILL make your marriage stronger.

It's a direct cause and effect. If you know and apply the laws, the results are predictable... you can 'make'love .

Love in marriage is indeed a 'decision'... Not just a feeling.

Remember this always :

'God determines who walks into your life. It is up to you to decide who you let walk away, who you let stay, and who you refuse to let go.'